Great Video with some insights to your brain. Enjoy!
Some people are my personal heroes. Jia Jiang is a great example of someone who overcame his issues (fear of rejection) by direct confrontation. He mastered his demon, learned something about human nature and is able to tell you his story with humor. It blew me.
I released the first version of my IBIS notation editor to the Mac App Store today. Over the next weeks will I need to polish it and beautify the supporting material like screenshots, etc. But have a look here: https://kneupner.de/software/visual-thinking-ibis
So what is IBIS? I found this page as an introduction. The same author did one more blog on the topic. The author (Chris Tomich) did a good job. If you want to understand more, read the book from Paul Culmsee and Kailash Awati.
I disabled the comments for this blog post. Please comment on the software page.
One of the most interesting things in life for me is to understand myself better. How do I react to my environment? And why do I react the way you do? Since I started thinking about myself I am able to work on myself. Patterns arise and understanding grows. Knowing myself allows me to playing to my strengths and therefore improves my personal happiness.
One of the things that I enjoy are self-assessments. A good self-assessment explains some facets of your personality. The most interesting for me was the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). In case you are interested: I wrote my personal result on my webpage. The quickest assessment so far was a PI assessment that I had to provide prior to my interview for my current job. HR draw a very precise picture of me just on the base of a few selections of mine. Stunning! I found another interesting test a couple of days ago. It is called PersonalDNA. I quite enjoyed it and realised that the results are quite consistent with what I know about myself. I quite like as well the Johari Window. Make your own Johari Window here.
Good luck on your own journey to yourself. Clearly, assessments are only a small step on the way. But nonetheless, please let me know if you know good assessments.
Today, I tried again to go dancing. A while ago (about 2 years ago) I decided it’s finally time to learn dancing. It fitted well and -to be honest- it helped that my friends had a similar idea. So I went Salsa dancing for a while. Every week. It was fun, but to be honest, I liked the social bit more. And that bit got more difficult, since the course was up to three hours. Beginners started, the next hour was for intermediates, the third hour for experts – at least from my point of view, since I never made it. Eventually, I started some other private things and had no time anymore.
Obviously, if I would have liked it better, I would have continued. But I didn’t really made progress. Neither in Salsa (difficult to start with), nor in Ceroc. Ceroc is much easier than Salsa. But even in Ceroc lessons I always reached the stage where I felt odd. I couldn’t do the same moves over and over. For two simple reasons:
* it’s boring, I guess as well for my partner. Somehow, I even loose the order of the moves, I’m that bored/unconcentrated/not into it. And I have no clue how to get back in track. Strange situations are the result.
* as soon as the partner knows the move as well (or even learns it as well), she is already moving as she should, not as I lead her. Therefore, I wasn’t sure whether I led her or not.
Today, after nearly half a year without dancing lessons, I tried it again. Similar feelings. But today I left before it got really awkward. Instead, I thought about my dancing for the very first time. I thought about whether it was good to leave once without feeling ashamed. I thought about that I tried today to ask an experienced dancer to show me how she really knows what I intend for her to do. That was good. I felt a bit like a quitter. That was bad.
And then I realised something. I read a blog a while ago about learning from Sources of Insight. In that article is a brief theory on learning based on two dimensions and two different ways of learning for each dimension: abstract or concrete and sequential or random. And now, it’s so simple. These dancing lessons are not fitting to my learning style! All this time, I try to learn dancing by examples. The lesson is concrete practise and the moves are more or less in random order (maybe selected by difficulty, but more by how it looks like). Instead I need an abstract introduction. I need an overview of all the possibilities first. Otherwise i can’t really use it and forget everything what I learned until the next week.
The positive result for me is instantaneously. I have a plan what to do next lesson. And once again I learned two important lessons.
1) If something doesn’t work out, think about why it doesn’t work. It’s that simple.
2) To have a framework in the back of your mind is helpful. Too many things are not processed in my mind, because I don’t have a hook to grab them. They pass by unnoticed. Once I heard something on a topic, I get sensibly. Once I’m sensibly for something, I can include it in my thoughts. In this case, I’m still not sure what class I fall into for the learning. Definitely the abstract learning, but I don’t know yet whether I need random or sequel data. But that doesn’t matter. I will find it out or will ignore the second dimension of the learning framework eventually if it doesn’t matter for me. But what is important, it made me think the next time I had a problem form that area.